Beginning of this page
Jump to main content

Please note that JavaScript and style sheet are used in this website,
Due to unadaptability of the style sheet with the browser used in your computer, pages may not look as original.
Even in such a case, however, the contents can be used safely.


Worldwide Worldwide >  AmericaAmerica

Advantages Over Embedded SRAM


NEC Electronics' eDRAM offers SRAM-like access that is far faster than competing eDRAM. Moreover, eDRAM provides several advantages over SRAM.


CB-130M 1-port memory area comparisons

CB-130M 1-port memory area comparisons

As the area vs. capacity graph shows, SRAM area increases linearly with bit capacity. The eDRAM scales much more slowly after including a one-time area requirement for the charge pump. For the 130 nm generation, the cross-over point between eDRAM and eSRAM area is about 512 Kb. By the 8 Mb level, eDRAM takes less than 1/4 - 1/5 the area of SRAM.


CB-130M 1-port memory power comparisons

CB-130M 1-port memory power comparisons

Even more dramatic are eDRAM's advantages relating to power and soft error rate (SER). Because eDRAM consumes far less power than SRAM, using eDRAM may allow you to eliminate package heat sinks and other expensive cooling options, thus reducing overall system cost.


CB-130M 1-port memory SER comparisons

CB-130M 1-port memory SER comparisons

SRAM's soft error rate has become a bigger problem with each shrink in process geometries. For an 8 Mb memory at the 130 nm process node, for example, SRAM exhibits an SER three orders of magnitude higher than that of eDRAM. SRAM's SER becomes even worse at 90 nm and beyond, as the smaller transistors become more susceptible to state changes.

Because eDRAM cells have stable storage capacitor values, eDRAM offers much better SER characteristics than SRAM. Embedded DRAM thus offers an excellent alternative for improving SoC reliability.



 
Click here to rate this page